Marker.io hands the context to your agent.
Snag runs the agent.
Marker.io is a strong website-feedback widget: annotate the screenshot, send, and on their Team tier the report arrives with a detailed log of all network activity attached. Their MCP page is refreshingly direct about what comes next — an AI agent pulls the context and opens the pull request, and that agent is yours to choose and run. The step Snag adds is the fix run itself: the same class of evidence is captured, then reproduced in a disposable copy of your repository, and the run ends in a pull request with a repro test that fails before the fix and passes after.
Where they are genuinely good
The widget is genuinely good, and the destination list is broad: Jira, Linear, Trello, GitHub, ClickUp, Asana and more, which is wider than the two trackers Snag connects for now. Annotating the screenshot inside the widget is the fastest possible path from noticing a bug to filing one. The MCP server at Marker.io is included for every customer at no extra cost, so pointing a coding assistant at your bug queue costs nothing extra there either.
Where Snag is different
Where Snag differs is ownership of the last step. Triage decides whether a bug is fixable in code before any money is spent, and skips cost nothing. The agent then works inside a private, disposable copy of your repository, replays the captured session, writes a repro test that fails before the fix and passes after, runs your own suite against it, and opens a pull request with the diff and the evidence it used. A critic pass reviews that fix before you ever see it. Nothing merges without a human, and a run that produces no pull request costs half.
Which one to pick
If you already run a coding agent you trust and only want it supplied with good context, Marker.io is a good widget and a good source of that context. If you would rather not choose, configure, host and maintain that agent, or you want the fix to arrive with a test that proves it, Snag is the product that runs the whole loop, and its price does not change as the team grows.
Snag and Marker.io, side by side
Every Marker.io cell links to the page we read it on.
| Feature | Snag | Marker.io |
|---|---|---|
| What the widget captures | Session replay, console, network and repro steps on every plan, masked in the browser before anything uploads — inputs are never recorded | A screenshot with each report; the detailed network log comes with session replay and developer tools, which sit on their Team tier rather than the $39 Starter plan Verified 2026-08-25 |
| Marking up the screenshot | The replay plays back what the person who reported the bug did, with console and network beside it | Annotate the screenshot inside the widget, then send Verified 2026-08-25 |
| What the AI does with a new report | Triage reads the captured signals and filters out what cannot be fixed in code — a skip is free | Generates a concise, actionable issue title from the description that was written Verified 2026-08-25 |
| Who runs the coding agent | Snag runs it — a disposable sandbox, a repro test that fails before the fix and passes after, then a PR | Your AI agent pulls the context over MCP and opens the pull request Verified 2026-08-25 |
| Pricing model | $29/mo flat per workspace, unlimited members | Headline is the annual rate: Starter costs $39 per month when billed annually, $59 per month when billed monthly Verified 2026-08-25 |
| What another person on the team costs | No extra cost — every plan covers unlimited members | Three users included; extra users are a paid add-on, listed at $6 and $4 per month each Verified 2026-08-25 |
| What it takes for someone to report a bug | Also free — members are unlimited on every plan, and filing a bug never needs an account or a licence | No charge and no account for the people who report bugs, and whoever filed one can follow it up afterwards Verified 2026-08-25 |
| BYO agent over MCP | MCP server for your own agent, included from the Capture plan up | Available to every customer at no extra cost Verified 2026-08-25 |
| Integrations breadth | Jira and GitHub for now | Jira, Linear, Trello, GitHub, ClickUp, Asana and more Verified 2026-08-25 |
| Getting started without paying | A free plan that never expires, with 15 bug reports a month and no card | A 15-day free trial on every plan, no credit card Verified 2026-08-25 |
Questions people actually ask
Is Snag a drop-in replacement for Marker.io?
For the capture half, close to it: a widget, a screenshot, network activity attached, and the report filed into the tracker you already use. The difference is the second half. The MCP page at Marker.io describes letting an AI agent pull the bug context and open a pull request, using an agent you choose, wire up, host and run. With Snag, that agent runs here, inside a disposable copy of your repository, and the pull request is handed to you at the end.
How does Snag's pricing compare to Marker.io's?
Marker.io advertises the annual rate: Starter costs $39 per month when billed annually, or $59 per month when billed monthly, with three users included and extra users listed at $6 and $4 per month each. The Snag price is flat per workspace and members are unlimited, so growing the team does not change the invoice. Fix plans add a monthly pool of fix-runs on top, and the live figures are in the pricing section of the homepage.
Both ship an MCP server. What is actually different?
Very little about the MCP servers themselves. Every customer at Marker.io gets one at no extra cost, and Snag includes one from the Capture plan up. An MCP server is now normal in this category, so a comparison that presents it as a point of difference is not being straight with you. The real difference is who does the work once the connection is made: with Snag, the fix run is ours to execute, in our sandbox, and it ends in a pull request you review.
What proves a Snag fix actually works?
A pull request carrying a repro test that fails before the fix and passes after, the diff, and the evidence the agent worked from. Nothing merges without a human, and the sandbox is destroyed when the run ends. A run that finishes without a pull request costs half, so you pay for work products rather than attempts, and the first 5 fixes are free on every plan.
Where these details come from
Every Marker.io detail on this page links to the Marker.io page we read it on, with the date we read it. Something out of date? Email admin@dvcllc.io and we will fix it.
Try the loop. Judge the PRs.
Unlimited free capture, and your first 5 AI fixes are on us — on every plan.